JAIN KIRANA GENERAL STORES Vs. RADHEY SHYAM HADA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioners, who are tenants, by way of this revision petition, have come up challenging the order dated 4. 12. 1997 (impugned) passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (JD), No. 2, Jaipur City, Jaipur, in Civil Suit No. 163/1996, whereby petitioners-defendants' evidence has been closed.

(3.) AS a result of this discussion, I find no error on the part of the trial court in having declined the permission to the petitioners in the matter of recording of evidence, which requires no interference by this Court. However, in the interest of justice, last opportunity is given to the petitioners to lead their evidence. No further extension shall be permitted at any cost. The petitioner is accordingly directed to produce his witnesses at his own responsibility before the trial court on 10. 07. 2001 and, if they are so produced, as directed, they be examined by the trial court in the first instance as the case is pending since 1996. The trial court is further directed to decide the matter expeditiously and in any case not later than four months from the date of submission of certified copy of this Order.