RSEB Vs. KANTILAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE appellant has filed the appeal aggrieved with the order of the learned Single Judge holding the termination order of the respondents to be stigmatic in character, and having passed without holding an enquiry and without affording any opportunity of hearing to the respondents, the order of termination is bad.

(3.) IN this view of the matter, we are in agreement with the conclusion reached by the learned Single Judge.