(1.) THE petitioners State of Rajasthan and the Assistant Engineer have challenged in this petition the impugned award dated 7.1.99 (Annex.8} passed by the Labour Court, Jodhpur whereby the Labour Court while declaring the termination of the respondent workman had, ordered only compensation of Rs. 27,000/ - instead of reinstatement with back wages.
(2.) ON the basis of the impugned order dated 27.7.91 (Annex. 3), learned counsel Mr. Mehta tried to submit that the appointment of the workman was purely on daily wages basis and his services were terminated prior to completion of 240 days.
(3.) THE impugned award dated 7.1.99 has not been so far challenged by !he respondent workman, therefore, I am not required to give my verdict as to whether he was rightly denied the reinstatement with back wages or not?