MAHARAJ SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the respective parties.

(2.) THIS appeal is preferred by the appellants I and 2 against the judgment dated 12. 9. 1997 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court holding that the petitioner-appellants are not entitled to any relief. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed. The writ petition was filed by the appellants to quash the order dated 24. 12. 1993 and to reinstate them in service as substantive teacher Gr. III with all consequential benefits and to declare the decree of B. Ed. obtained by them from the Avadh University, Faizabad in the year 1987 as legal and valid for all the purposes to come and for other incidental reliefs.

(3.) THE main grievance of Shri R. K. Agarwal, the learned counsel for the appellants is that the services of the appellants have been terminated by the respondents without affording opportunity of hearing their grievances. According to the learned counsel for the appellants, the certificates produced by them are genuine and that the case put forward by them therefore, should be accepted and relied.