MOJUDDIN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal has been filed by the accused appellant against the judgment dated 15-4-2000 and order of sentence dated 6-5-2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Women Atrocities Cases), Bhilwara in Sessions Case No. 278/97 by which he convicted the accused-appellant for the offence under Sections 366, 376 and 344, IPC and sentenced in the following manner :- The above substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. @@2000.htm@@

(2.) The facts giving rise to this appeal, in short, are as follows :-

(3.) In this appeal, the only argument which has been raised by the learned counsel for the accused-appellant, is that from the statements of PW1 Gulab, father of the prosecutrix, PW2 Sukhi, mother of the prosecutrix and from the statement of the prosecutrix PW6 Mst. Prem herself, no case of either rape or abduction is made out against the accused-appellant, but on the contrary it is established that the prosecutrix PW6 Mst. Prem has gone with the accused-appellant on her own will.