SUKHPAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the accused petitioners, Shri Praveen Balwada as well as the learned Public Prosecutor, Shri Rajendra Yadav, assisted by Shri B. M. Gurjar.

(2.) FROM the arguments of the learned counsel for both the parties, it is revealed that the accused petitioners were enlarged on anticipatory bail by a Cordinate Bench of this Court on 6. 10. 1999, with a direction that the order grating per-arrest bail was to remain valid till the expiry of one months after submission of challan papers.

(3.) WITH the aforesaid observations, the order impugned passed by learned Magistrate under sub-Sec. (5) of Sec. 437 Cr. P. C. dated 11. 8. 2000, is affirmed and the present petition moved u/sec. 482 Cr. P. C. is finally disposed of at admission stage.