L D GUPTA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE only question now left to be determined in the present writ petition is whether because of delayed payment of the retiral benefits to the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to the interest on such delayed payment.

(2.) THE petitioner retired on 31. 3. 1999. Because of certain charge-sheet, the retiral benefits were not paid. THE provisional pension was sanctioned on 24. 5. 1999 and payment was made to the petitioner in the month of March 2000. THE petitioner stood totally exonerated on 25. 3. 2000 vide Annexure-6 from the charges. He made representation to the respondents for the payment of retiral benefits and even a legal notice was issued vide Annexure 7, 8 and 9, but still payment was not made.

(3.) THE writ petition is disposed off accordingly. .