SUBHASH SIKHWAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) NOTICE to the respondents.

(2.) THE respondent No. 2 is Special Judge, Family Court, Udaipur, who is a formal party. He should not have been joined as party respondent as per the latest judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, therefore, no notice is required to be issued to the respondent No. 1.

(3.) APPLICATION for D. N. A. test is dated 13. 5. 1999 which is annexed to this petition. I am really shocked and surprised that so far the learned family judge has not thought it fit to decide the same. In such type of matrimonial cases, the learned Judge cannot afford to sit tight over the matter for a long time. It is his duty to decide the application in accordance with law and pass appropriate order.