YASMEEN KHANAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALL the petitioners were eligible for appointment on the post of Teacher Gr. III (Urdu) and possessed the minimum qualifications as provided in the Rajasthan Education Subordinate Service Rules, 1971. They had applied in response to the advertisement dated 9. 10. 1996 for such appointment relating to the recruitment for the year 1996-97. Even though number of vacancies for General Teachers were also advertised, but 10 vacancies were to be filled up for Urdu Teacher Gr. III. As per annexure attached to the writ petition No. 4778/1998, the select list of Teacher Gr. III was published and pasted on the notice board.

(2.) ALL the petitioners were interviewed. A merit list of 35 of Urdu candidates was prepared. The petitioners were within the list of 10 persons put on merit as per Schedule attached to the writ petition. It is the grievance that even though the petitioners were on merit, but except three persons Rubina, Mumtaz Khan and Abida none else have been given appointment even though respondents were selected as General Teacher and also even though they had not been shows on merit list for Urdu teachers.

(3.) THIS writ petition has been filed by one Yashmeen Khanam. THIS petitioner had applied in view of the advertisement dated 9. 10. 1996, copy of which has been attached as Annex. 5 for the Sessions 1996-97 for the post of Assistant Teacher Gr. III (Urdu) called Urdu Teacher for 10 posts. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1674/97