ARCHANA KUMARI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE candidature of the appellant-original petitioner was rejected only on the ground that she had crossed age of 40, therefore, her case was not considered by the respondents. THE same was challenged by her before this Court by way of writ petition No. 4165/98, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 15. 1. 99. Hence, this special appeal.

(2.) LEARNED counsel Mr. Parihar for the appellant submitted that under Rule 11 (B) of the Rajasthan Subordinate Services (Direct Recruitment by Combind Competitive Examinations) Rules, 1962, the petitioner was entitled to be considered as she is from women category. He submitted that under Rule 11 (B) (1) of the Rules the upper age limit shall have to be relaxed by further 5 years in her case and that she has not completed 45 years, therefore, the respondents committed an error in rejecting her candidature.

(3.) HAVING carefully gone through the order passed by the learned Single Judge and for the reasons assigned in it, we are of the opinion that no interference is called for in this special appeal.