KAWLA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) At the time of hearing of application for suspension of sentence, a request was made by the learned counsel for the accused appellants that the appeal itself may be heard finally as the record has already been received. Hence, the appeal itself was heard finally.

(2.) This appeal has been filed by the accused appellants against the judgment and order dated 10.1.2001 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Banswara in Sessions Case No. 74/98 by which he acquitted both the accused appellants for the offence under section 368 IPC, but convicted both the accused appellants for the offence under sections 376, 366 and 450 Penal Code and sentenced in the following manner : <FRM>JUDGEMENT_119_LAWS(RAJ)3_2001_1.html</FRM> All the above substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

(3.) It arises in the following circumstances :