PREM KUMARI Vs. TEEJA DEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision petition arises out of an order dt. 11. 4. 2001 of the Addl. Distt. Judge No. 6, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Civil Suit No. 71/95 whereby,an application under Sec. 151 CPC praying therein for extension of time to lead defendant's evidence was dismissed.

(2.) ADMITTED facts are that the suit was instituted on 22. 8. 89 to which written statement was filed by defendant (petitioner) and after framing of the necessary issues the plaintiff's evidence was closed on 11. 12. 96 and since then the trial of the suit stands hanged by latitude on the part of the defendant by not leading their evidence by postponing the same for one reason or the other.

(3.) ON the other hand, learned counsel for the plaintiff respondent vociferously contended that the trial is pending since 1989 and the fate of the suit has been hinging obviously because of the delay on the part of the defendants dilly dally tactics for leading evidence, for which the defendant has taken more than four years during which more than 35 opportunities have been afforded to her which shows her conduct of deliberately committing delay in the matter by filing applications and revision petitions one after the another and even after an undertaking before this Court in her own revision petition to completely adduce her evidence within further four months again she failed to show any regard to the directions of this Court.