LAWS(RAJ)-2001-12-38

BANWARI LAL MANDIWAL Vs. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS

Decided On December 18, 2001
BANWARI LAL MANDIWAL Appellant
V/S
CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE short case of the petitioner is that he is a student of first year B. Sc. (Agriculture) Honours of the four year degree course in S. K. N. College of Agriculture, Jobner. He has cleared the first semester with 6. 07 grade point as per the mark sheet vide Annexure-1 dt. 13. 8. 2001. His further case is that on 2. 7. 2001 while he was attempting first year B. Sc. Agriculture (Hons.) II Semester 2000-2001 examination of "elements of Genetics" paper with Roll No. 554, he was found using unfair means and having been caught by the Invigilator on duty, he was debarred from appearing. THE petitioner received a show cause notice dt. 3. 7. 2001 from respondent No. 1 calling from his reply/explanation as to why punishment as per the norms be not imposed upon him. In pursuance of the show cause notice, petitioner appeared before the Committee on 17. 7. 2001 at 11. 30 A. M. and submitted his reply wherein, he clarified that there was no intention on his part to use unfair means and it was due to bonafide mistake that he could not erase certain points noted by him on the admission card for the purpose of his memory. He has also given undertaking not to repeat the same in future.

(2.) IT is pertinent to mention herein to quote hereinbelow the contents of clause 3 (c) of the Information Bulletin, 2000-2001 issued by the Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner:- "3. Norms of punishment to candidates guilty of unfairmeans and/or disorderly conduct:- (c) Where a candidate is found having in his/her possession of within his/her reach any material relevant to the syllabus of the examination paper concerned, but has not copied from or used (i) if the behaviour of the candidate on being caught is satisfactory- Present examination shall be cancelled provided that if the material found in possession of the candidate is of insignificant nature, the punishment may be relaxed to the extent of cancellation of the examination of that particular paper (theory or practical as the case may be) and he/she will be treated as having obtained "zero" mark in that paper with all the consequences to follow. However, if the candidate so desires, he/she will be given the option of the appearing in the subsequent whole examination by cancelling the present examination as a whole. "

(3.) I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the answer sheet of the petitioner of the concerning subject which has been made available for perusal of this Court by the University. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the entire material on record, I find that this writ petition is devoid of any merit.