GANIBA Vs. MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL DHOLPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HAVING gone through the order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dholpur I am satisfied that respondent No. 2 is only the contesting party.

(2.) ADMIT. Respondent No. 2 is represented by the Advocate. The matter is complete. The matter is taken up for hearing.

(3.) THE Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has gone on the merits of this contention raised by the counsel for the Company and though the first part of the prayer in the application is granted but so far as the second prayer is concerned the same has been declined. THE Tribunal has gone on the merits of the matter and held that as there is no evidence that death of deceased-Pinky has caused due to the injuries sustained by her prayer to file claim petition by the petitioner cannot be granted.