BEBI GUPTA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE facts giving rise to this revision filed by the plaintiff are as under:-

(2.) A suit had been filed by the plaintiff stating that she had been appointed as class IV employee of the State of Rajasthan (defendant No. l) vide order dated 10. 6. 1985 passed by the Addl. Collector Development, Alwar (defendant no. 2) for the period ending 31. 7. 1985, but her term of employment was extended from time to time and she continued working on her post till 18. 9. 1988, but when she reached her office on 19. 9. 1988, she was not allowed to work in the office and was orally informed that her services stood terminated with effect from 19. 9. 1988. It was stated that the action of the defendants in not allowing her to continue working in her job, was illegal and it was prayed that the defendants be directed by way of a permanent injunction to allow her to continue in her job and to continue paying her salary. Along with the plaint, an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (the Code) was also filed by the plaintiff praying that during the pendency of the suit a temporary injunction be issued directing the defendants to allow her to join the duty. The suit is being contested by the defendants who have also opposed the prayer made in the application for grant of temporary injunction. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the learned Munsif, Alwar held that no case had been made out for grant of temporary injunction and consequently, vide order dated 4. 10. 1988 dismissed her application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code. The appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed by the learned District Judge, Alwar vide the impugned order dated 30. 3. 1989 passed in Civil Appeal No. 135 of 1988. Feeling aggrieved , the plaintiff has approached this Court by filing this revision petition.

(3.) CONSEQUENTLY, this revision petition fails and is dismissed, but with no order as to costs. .