REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Shri Subendu Dixit Appellant

V/S

Rajasthan Agriculture Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

OFFICAL SOLICITOR V. K. [REFERRED TO]
PULLANGODA RUBBER PRODUCE CO. V. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO(SC) ;]
PREM FRAKASH V. PUNJAB UNIVERSITY [REFERRED TO.]
DILIP KUMAR PATNI V. STATE OF RAJ. AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
NORTH BIHAR AGENCY V. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
S.L. KAPOOR V. JAGMOHAN [REFERRED TO]
RANJIT THAKUR V. U.O.I. [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNA PILLAI VS. STATE OF MADRAS REPRESENTING THE INSPECTOR CUSTOMS SEA BASE CUDDALORE [REFERRED TO ,]
NARAYAN BHAGWANTRAO GOSAVI BALAJIWALE VS. GOPAL VINAYAK GOSAVI [REFERRED TO]
BOARD OF HIGH SCHOOL AND INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION U P ALLAHABAD VS. GHANSHYAM DAS GUPTA [REFERRED TO ,]
BOARD OF HIGH SCHOOL AND INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION U P ALLAHABAD VS. BAGLESHWAR PRASAD [REFERRED TO]
UNIVERSITY OF MYSORE H H ANNISH GOWDA VS. C D GOVINDA RAO [REFERRED TO,]
MAHENDRA MANILAL NANAVATI VS. SUSHILA MAHENDRA NANAVATI [REFERRED TO]
PRINCIPAL PATNA COLLEGE PATNA VS. KALYAN SRINIVAS RAMAN [REFERRED TO ,]
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA LIMITED VS. KARUNAMOY BANERJEE [REFERRED TOSC ,]
CHANNABASAPPA BASAPPA HAPPALI VS. STATE OF MYSORE [REFERRED TO ,]
BAREILLY ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED VS. WORKMEN [REFERRED TOSC ;]
PREM PARKASH KALUNIYA VS. PUNJAB UNIVERSITY [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. MOKSH BUILDERS AND FINANCIERS LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
THIRU JOHN V SUBRAHMANYAM VS. RETURNING OFFICER:RETURNING OFFICER [REFERRED TO]
RAMJI DAYAWALA AND SONS PRIVATE LIMITED VS. INVEST IMPORT [REFERRED TO ,]
CENTRAL INLAND WATER TRANSPORT CORPORATION LIMITED VS. BROJO NATH GANGULY / TARUN KANTI SENGUPTA [REFERRED TO]
H L TREHAN HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
MARATHWADA UNIVERSITY VS. SESHRAO BALWANT RAO CHAVAN [REFERRED TO]
PYARE LAL SHARMA MANAGING DIRECTOR JAMMU AND KASHMIR INDUSTRIES LIMITED SRINAGAR VS. MANAGING DIRECTOR:PYARE LAL SHARMA [REFERRED TO]
GHAZANFAR RASHID VS. BOARD H S AND I EDN U P FB" [REFERRED TO ,]
MOHD YAKUB ANSARI VS. DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA [REFERRED TO]
BRIGHT SON JOSE VS. MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY [REFERRED TO .]
DILIP SINGH VS. UNIVERSITY OF JODHPUR [REFERRED TO]
MAHENDRA MATHUR VS. UNIVERSITY OF UDAIPUR [REFERRED TO]
OM PRAKASH VS. UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE six writ petitions arise out of the same order dated 3rd/7th July 1989 passed by the Controller of Examinations, Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner where by the Board of Management of the Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner has confirmed this punishment of current examinations cancelled imposed against the petitioners for using unfair means in the examinations of 1988.

(2.) THE facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this writ petition briefly, stated are: that the academic career of the petitioners is meritorious. They have secured first Division marks in all public examinations in which they appeared and, therefore, they took entrance test of PMT/PVT for the purpose of degree course of BVSC and Animal Husbandary in the then Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University, Udaipur They were successful and were admitted. They passed their first year examinations of the BVSC and Animal Husbandary degree course from the Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University of Udaipur in the year 1987 but later, it appears that the Govt, of Rajasthan thought it fit to establish an Agricultural University viz. Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner and, therefore, the faculty of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandary of Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University, Udaipur has been put under the control of Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner and the petitioners are prosecuting their studies under the newly established University i.e. Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner.

(3.) BE that as it may, the petitioners have contended that sofaras known to them, no Ordinance of the respondent Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner have been framed and all that has been done is that the Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University Udaipur has conducted the examination and instruction to Centre Superintendent were issued by the said University, which were also made available to the student on demand. The photocopy of the instructions to Superintendent of Examination Centre have been filed along with the writ petitions (Marked as Annexure -4 in Subendu Dixit's case) The term 'unfair means' stands described at pages 4 and 5. On the said instructions. It further prescribes the procedure and norms of punishment.

Click here to view full judgment.

SHRI SUBENDU DIXIT Vs. RAJASTHAN AGRICULTURE

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address