DAULAT RAM Vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE two revision petitions one filed by petitioner Daulatram and the other filed by petitioner Bhaddar Sen, raise similar legal question and, therefore, they were heard together and now, they are being decided by a common order.

(2.) IT is alleged that the respondent Punjab National Bank through its Branch Manager, Srikaranpur filed applications before the prescribed authority i. e. Sub-Divisional Officer, Sri Ganganagar against the petitioners Daulatram and Bhadder Sen for the recovery of Rs. 37,076. 72p and Rs. 56,838. 90p. respectively under the Rajasthan Agricultural Credit Operations (Removal of Difficulties) Act,1974 (for short 'the Act' herein) These applications were filed on 12. 10. 1984 and on the same day, the competent authority issued attachment warrants.

(3.) OUR attention has drawn by Mr. N. P. Gupta, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents on a Division Bench decision of this Court in Sainiks Motors V. S. T. Authority (1), wherein it has been held that appeals are creations of statute and unless a person can bring himself within the four corners of the Statute law prescribing appeals, he cannot go before any appellate authority.