KAMJI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE three writ petitions, under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution, raise common questions for determination and are, therefore, disposed of by a common order.

(2.) IT will be convenient lo notice the facts leading to the filing of S.B Civil Writ Petition No. 469/19/9.

(3.) A show cause notice was issued to the respondents. In pursuance of which, reply to it was filed on behalf of respondents No. along with documents. In the reply, respondent No. 2 has raised the following preliminary objections (1) that the writ petition is belated, for, declaration was made on July 18,1978 and it was filed on February 24,979. (8) that the writ petition is not properly constituted (4) that the questions raised by the petitioners are complicated, which cannot be conveniently examined in the writ proceeings and, (4) that the petitioners are guilty of making false statements in the writ petition and as they have not come with clean hands, it is liable to be dismissed : As regards merits of the writ petition, it was stated that the declaration of the village Padola as Gramdan village was made after following the procedure are laid down in Sections. 8,10 and 11 of the Act and the Rules made thereunder and, therefore, it was prayed in the reply that the writ petition should be dismissed.