MANGILAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE six writ petitions have been filed by the Railway empolyees. Since common questions of law have been raised in the writ petition's and argued, all these cases are being decided by one judgment, as prayed.

(2.) IT would be necessary first to mention facts from one writ petition in order to appreciate the controversy. The petitioner was appointed as the Trains Cleric in the Railway. The appointment was made after selection by Railway Service Commission which included written, interview and departmental training.

(3.) WHILE petitioner and others are holding the post of Senior Trains Clerk, the Assistant Personal Officer Shri T. N. Bhargava has issued order first mentioning that the order of promotion dated 24 -9 -80 to be kept pending till further orders. Later on, by order dated 1 -10 -80, the petitioner has been reverted to the post of Trains Clerk by cancelling the order of promotion dated 24 -9 -80 which was issued by Divisional Personnel Officer.