LAWS(RAJ)-1980-12-17

NORANG LAL Vs. KESAR

Decided On December 05, 1980
Norang Lal Appellant
V/S
KESAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act (No. XXV of 1955) (for short the Act hereafter) by the husband, who was the petitioner, against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Sriganganagar dated March 22, 1979, by which he dismissed the husband's petition under Section 13 of the Act.

(2.) THE marriage between the parties was solemnised according to the Hindu rites 12 years before the date of the presentation of the petition which was filed on January 13, 1977. The parties lived together as husband and wife for 10 years. Out of this wedlock, five children were born, four sons and one daughter. Two of the sons died. The remaining sons we are living with the wife while the daughter is living with the husband. It has been stated that in the months of November December, 1974, when the wife was to deliver 5th child, the wife's brother Maniram came and told him to send her. The wife was sent with him and since then, she has not returned to his house. In other words, the case of the husband is that the wife -respondent had withdrawn from his society for the last four years and since then, she has not returned to his house and living with her parents. The wife is said to have intiated proceedings for the grant of maintenance under Section 125, Cr. PC on December 12, 1974 on the ground that she has been turned out from the house as her parents had not given good dowry. The husband is said to have gone to bring her but she refused to come. The application filed under Section 125, Cr. PC. was contested by the husband. The Judicial Magistrate, by his order dated March 4, 1976, fixed Rs. 40/ - per month as the amount of maintenance. The wife preferred a revision and the learned Additional District Judge enhanced the amount from Rs. 40/ - p.m. to Rs. 80/ - p. m. Thereafter, proceedings were initiated for the recovery of the arrears of maintenance. The averments have also been made that the husband had made the efforts to bring the wife, but she, without any reasonable cause, withdrawn herself from the society of the husband. The husband has filed the petition under Section 13 of the Act praying for the dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground of desertion by the wife for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately preceding the date of the presentation of the petition.

(3.) I have heard Mr. R.R. Vyas for the appellant and Mr. M.L. Garg for the respondent and have gone through the record of the case.