LAWS(RAJ)-1970-5-13

POONAM CHAND JOSHI Vs. UNION OF INDIA

Decided On May 12, 1970
POONAM CHAND JOSHI Appellant
V/S
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE three writ petitions arise out of facts which are quite similar. They have been argued together by the learned counsel for the parties and I shall dispose them of by this judgment as suggested by them.

(2.) ALL the three petitioners were confirmed employees of the Union of India (respondent No 1) serving in the Northern Railway. They were going on 55, when they were served by three separate orders, each of which has been marked Ex. 1, giving, inter alia three months' notice of their retirement. The orders were issued by the Dvsnl. Personal Officer with the approval of Dvsnl. Supdt., Jodhpur. They were issued on different dates. In the case of Poonamchand, order Ex. 1 was issued on September 4, 1968, retiring him finally from December 15, 1968. It is not disputed that the order was served on him on October 1, 1969. There is, however, no dispute about the inadequacy of the notices given to Pukhraj and Kanwar Singh, so that it is not necessary to give dates. The petitioners have moved this court on a number of grounds which I shall have occasion to examine when I deal with the arguments of their learned counsel. It will be sufficient to say that although it was one of grievances of the petitioners that the notices were issued by an authority subordinate to that by which they were appointed, that ground has not been pressed for my consideration.

(3.) IT has next been argued that the rule violates the principles of natural justice because it does not provide for a show cause notice to the employee against his retirement even though he has a right to serve up to the age of 58 years under the rule. The argument has been supported by a reference to the decision in Col. J.N. Sinha vs. Union of India (15), State of Orissa vs. Dr. (Miss) Binapani Dei (16) and A.K. Kraipak vs. Union of India (17).