(1.) THOUGH these two appeals arise out of two different suitsInstituted by two different persons, they are being disposed of by one common judgment because they raise common questions of law and fact. Appeal No. 117 of 1958.
(2.) THIS is a plaintiff's appeal against the judgment and decree of the Senior Civil Judge. Baran, dated 28th August, 1958. dismissing the suit for recovery of Rs. 13,200A.
(3.) THE State of Rajasthan In its written statement raised a number of pleas including the bar of limitation and the present suit being barred because of the provisions of Order 2, Rule 2, Civil P. C. It was also stated that the aforesaid procurement orders were quite valid and did not violate Article 31(2) of the Constitution because the orders contained provisions for payment of compensation and as a matter of fact fixed the amount of compensation to be paid to the plaintiff for the procurement of food -grains.