(1.) THIS is an appeal under sec. 39 of the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against an order of the Additional Com-missioner Jagir dated 30. 4. 59, whereby respondent No. 1 was held to be a co-sharer to the extent of one-third in the jagir grant of the appellants.
(2.) WE have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record as well. Shri P. D. Kudal, appearing for the State Government, stated before us that he was not interested in the result of the appeal being one way or the other. Hence the term 'respondent' in this judgment would refer to the contesting respondent Mst. Kampoori.
(3.) TO conclude, therefore, we hold that the documentary evidence led by the parties leads to the irresistible conclusion that Mst. Kapoori had throughout been recognised as a co-sharer of one-third in the State grant and that she is accordingly entitled to a proportionate share in the compensation and rehabilitation grant payable under the Act. The decision of the learned Additional Jagir Commissioner is, therefore, perfectly correct and calls for no interference. We accordingly hereby reject the appeal. .