AMBA LAL Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the parties.

(2.) THE accused applicant stands convicted Under Section 19 (f), Arms Act and sentenced to pay a fine of Es. 800. THE case of the prosecution was that he had 'in his possession thirty 12-bore and five. 38-bore unlicensed cartridges. THE main contention of the accused-applicant before the Court is that the prosecution have altogether failed to show that the alleged recovery had. been made from his possession. THE contention, in my opinion, is not altogether without weight and is supported to a considerable extent by the very evidence produced on behalf of the prosecution before the trial Court.