LAWS(RAJ)-2020-11-27

LALA Vs. STATE

Decided On November 06, 2020
LALA Appellant
V/S
STATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard.

(2.) Perused the material available on record. The case of the prosecution is based totally on circumstantial evidence. The allegations of the prosecution as against the appellant and the co-accused Bhalla Ram @ Bhaliya @ Sahi Ram are identical. The application for suspension of sentences filed on behalf of co- accused Bhalla Ram @ Bhaliya @ Sahi Ram was accepted by this Court vide order dated 17.10.2019 passed in D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 992/2019 in the following manner:

(3.) On basis of this very order, applications for suspension of sentences filed on behalf of co-accused Mohan Ram and Anil Kumar have already been accepted by this Court vide orders dated 11.11.2019 and 02.01.2020 passed in D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Applications (Appeal) Nos.1194/2019 and 1339/2019.