MADAN LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In all these writ petitions, the petitioners challenged the ord er impugned dated 29.03.2019, whereby their appointments as Safai employee were cancelled on account of furnishing wrong affidavit and concealment of information regarding their children, particularly, for violation of Rule 9A of the Rajasthan Municipalities (Safai Employees Service) Rules, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules of 2012').

(2.) Though the present writ petitions have been reserved for judgment on different date(s), but looking to the commonality of the issue involved herein, they have been considered analogously and are being decided by this common judgment.

(3.) These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been preferred claiming, in sum and substance, the following reliefs: