RIJWAN MUGAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) No body has appeared for the appellants. The record of proceedings makes out that despite repeated listing of this matter on 17.07.2009, 27.07.2009, 15.09.2009, 09.10.2009, 04.11.2009, 20.11.2009 and 27.01.2010, nobody has ever appeared for the appellants. Having regard to the circumstances, we have perused the record and find no reason to keep this appeal pending.

(2.) The appellants-petitioners were engaged as Vidhyarthi Mitra to undertake teaching work in schools on contract basis under the scheme framed by the State Government; they approached this Court by filing the respective writ petitions stating the grievance, inter alia, that their services would not be continued after summer break. It appears that the engagement of some of incumbents continued during the pendency of the litigation pursuant to the orders passed by the Court. Thereafter, a batch of petitions involving similar issues was decided at Jaipur Bench of this Court on 08.05.2009 with certain directions essentially to the effect that the respondents shall consider the cases of petitioners for continuation in service until the regular selections were made but with the observations that the petitioners would not be entitled for salary during the period of vacations i.e., when the schools remain closed. Following the said decision, the writ petition as preferred by the present appellants has been decided by the learned Single Judge of this Court in the same terms and with the same directions. Hence, this appeal.

(3.) It is noticed that the intra-court appeals as filed at the Jaipur Bench against the order dated 08.05.2009 have since been considered and dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Rajendra Kumar Saini & 126 Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., reported in 2010 (1) WLC (Raj.) 171.