AYUB AHMED Vs. DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND ANR.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for parties.

(2.) THIS writ petition has been filed by petitioner challenging order dated 08.06.1994 of his removal and order dated 11.09.1996 rejecting his appeal filed there -against.

(3.) SHRI Manoj Pareek, learned Counsel for petitioner, contended that copy of the enquiry report was not supplied to the petitioner prior to passing of order dated 08.06.1994, which has seriously prejudiced his case. The petitioner submitted an application to disciplinary authority on 23.06.1994 demanding copies of fifteen documents, but the In -charge of the Land Records Section, by his order dated 29.06.1994 refused to supply him any of these documents on the pretext that the same were not available. Only two documents were given to him.