BHERU LAL Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These intra-court appeals, preferred against the set of common orders and involving identical issues on similar facts, have been heard together; and are taken up for disposal by this common judgment.

(2.) In relation to the issues involved, the relevant background aspects and the material facts appearing from the pleadings, from the material as placed on record, and from the material as placed for perusal during the course of hearing, could be noticed, in brief and in their feasible chronology, as follows.

(3.) On the other hand, it appears that on 26/27.02.2007, the concerned Patwari visited the site and forwarded a report to the Tehsildar who, in turn, forwarded such report on 01.03.2007 to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Rajsamand who further forwarded the same to the District Collector, Rajsamand under the communication dated 05.03.2007. Thereupon, the District Collector, Rajsamand proceeded to address the communication dated 24.04.2007 to the Deputy Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Jaipur pointing out the objections raised by the khatedars, the report made by the Sub Divisional Officer, and the position of the revenue record. The learned District Collector, Rajsamand stated in the said communication dated 24.04.2007 as under:-