RAJENDRA SHARMA Vs. APPELLATE RENT TRIBUNAL GANGANAGAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE Rent Tribunal vide order dated 8.4.2005 ordered for eviction of the petitioner-tenant on the ground of personal bonafide necessity of his landlord and said order of the Rent Tribunal was upheld by the Appellate Tribunal vide order dated 6.8.2009., therefore, this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner-tenant.

(3.) BE it as it may be and the manner in which the total pleadings may be, as noticed above, the tenant-present petitioner submitted detailed reply to the application and in para No. 13 of the reply specifically contested the issue of personal bonafide necessity of the landlady by treating it a ground for petitioner's eviction from the suit premises and also took specific plea that the applicant is residing in Government allotted residence and her sons are in service, therefore, she has no personal bonafide necessity for the suit premises. The plaintiff was cross-examined on the issue of personal bonafide necessity and then petitioner-tenant also gave his evidence contesting the issue of bonafide necessity.