NURUDIN Vs. SILLO

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner, who is complainant has filed this application under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. for cancellation of bail granted to Sillo @ Firoz under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. by the order of this court dated 18.9.2009.

(2.) It is contended by Mr. M.K. Kaushik, learned counsel for the complainant-petitioner that at the time of arguments in the bail application on 18.9.2009, learned counsel Mr. Suresh Sahni has made a false statement that except Pappi, whose bail application was withdrawn, the case under Section 307 IPC is not made out against other accused persons namely Kalian Khan, Noor, Hanif, Rafi, Bindu and Shillo. On this statement this court granted bail to these accused persons. The correct fact is that the main accused in the case is Shillo @ Firoz, who gave blow by stone and he is main accused.

(3.) For the reasons mentioned, above the application for cancellation of bail under Section 439 (2) Cr.P.C. filed by the complainant-petitioner is rejected. The trial Court is directed to complete the trial expeditiously.