JITENDRA SINGH @ JITU Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Aggrieved by the order dated 18.10.2010, passed by the Additional District and Session Judge (Fast Track) No.4, Jaipur City, Jaipur, whereby the learned Judge has framed the charges for offences under Sections 498A, 328 and 307 IPC, the petitioner has approached this Court.

(2.) On the other hand, Ms. Alka Bhatnagar, the learned Public Prosecutor, has strenuously contended that the claim made by the complainant, in her supplementary statement, is corroborated by the FSL report which is available in the charge-sheet. According to the FSL report, there is presence of Organophosphorous Insecticide. Thus, the FSL report corroborates the statement of the complainant that the petitioner had mixed poison/insecticide in the food consumed by her. Moreover, the learned Judge is merely required to see the existence of a strong prima facie case. In light of the FSL report, a strong prima facie case for offence under Section 307 is clearly made out against the petitioner.

(3.) Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order as well as the charge-sheet.