SHYAM BEHARI MATHUR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for parties.

(2.) THIS writ petition has been filed by petitioner Shyam Behari Mathur challenging therein order of his penalty dated 03.12.1987 by which three grade increments were withheld without cumulative effect, and order dated 29.12.1990 whereby his appeal filed against the said penalty order was dismissed by Board of Revenue and subsequent order dated 16.11.1995 by which his review petition was dismissed.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel submitted that this charge proceeded on assumption that mutation was attested in violation of Circular issued by the Deputy Commissioner Colonization, Bikaner, dated 04.09.1973, whereas petitioner was never served with copy of that Circular nor any such copy was ever endorsed to him. When the petitioner was not made known of that Circular, he could not be blamed for violating the departmental instructions of not attesting the mutation of the land falling within the Bikaner State unless the Khatedars concerned had submitted the declaration required by Section 15 -A(2) of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955. Learned Counsel submitted that the Board of Revenue in an identical matter where mutation of land belonging to Scheduled Caste was attested in favour of non -Scheduled Caste person, held that the order passed by Tehsildar was subject to challenge before appellate forum but this being the quasi -judicial functions exercised by him he could not be proceeded against in the disciplinary proceedings under the CCA Rules.