BHUVNESH @ BHULLI Vs. STATE AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) THIS parole writ petition has been preferred challenging the impugned order dt.8th/9th June, 2010 passed by District Parole Committee, Karauli whereby application of the Petitioner for grant of emergent parole has been rejected.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the State did not dispute the legal position of Rule 10A of the Rules, 1958.