HARSHA CHOUDHARY Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) MR. D.R. Kawadia, Dy. Government Counsel is directed to accept notice on behalf of State.

(3.) IT is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that from the documents sought under the Right to Information Act and produced now before this Court, would show that private respondent No. 5, Manju is resident of nearby Gram Panchayat, namely, Sindhari Chousira, and her address given in Annex-11 is 'Smt. Manju Devi W/o Hanumanaram, C/o Durga Ram Beniwal Ghasiyo Ka Bas, Doli, Sindhari, District Barmer.' Further, her voter identity card issued by the Election Commissioner of India also shows her address as Sindhari Chousira'. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that Gram Panchayat Sindhari Chousira is about 12 kilometres away from Ed- Sindhari village, where the respondent No. 5 has been appointed, the same is therefore gross violation of the conditions, and her appointment deserves to be quashed.