ANJALI MATHUR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) The petitioner applied for the post of Prabhodhak in pursuance to the advertisement (Annex.4) inviting applications for the said post. The petitioner has been denied appointment only on the ground that she was not possessing the requisite teaching experience of five years. The petitioner has placed on record the certificate (Annex.3) duly issued by the School countersigned by the District Education Officer wherein her teaching experience has been shown from 1.7.2003 to 30.6.2008. However, in place of 30.6.2008, the Additional District Education Officer made correction and made it 25.6.2008. By this deduction of five days, the petitioner is said to have not completed five years teaching experience.

(3.) From the facts referred above, it is clear that the petitioner completed five years teaching experience and she was eligible on this count and her appointment could not have been denied on this count. The petitioner was called for interview but her marks have not been taken into account in the interview.