QUIPPO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LTD. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SINCE the controversy involved in the above writ petitions is identical, the same are being decided by this common order.

(2.) NOTICES were issued by this Court on 10/03/2010 which were accepted by Mr. RB Mathur who is counsel for the respondent -department.

(3.) OUT of the three appeals preferred against the assessment order, referred to supra, in two appeals, the petitioners have deposited 10% of the amount assessed and in one appeal, as alleged, being the ex -parte assessment order, 5% is the requirement under law that has been deposited by the petitioner and it has not been converted by the respondents.