NARESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) Both the learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in these petitions is squarely covered by the judgment of a Coordinate Bench of this Court rendered in SBCWP No. 9173/2009 (Sandroop S/o Shri Abu Ram Vs. The State of Raj. & Ors.) and a batch of 59 other writ petitions decided on 19.3.2010 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prakash Tatia. The said order is reproduced as under for ready reference. The learned counsel for the parties submit that part of Condition No.4 has been stayed by the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court Bench, Jaipur, however, that will not affect the fate of these writ petitions and both the counsel submit that similar directions, subject to the effect of the interim order as passed by the Division Bench of the Jaipur Bench of the High Court, may be passed in these matters also. 2. In view of the above reasons, all these writ petitions are disposed of in the light of the directions issued in the S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2578/09 Devendra Kumar & Ors. V. State and connected matters decided vide judgment dated 15.5.2009 and in the light of the decision given in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4652/09 and connected matters decided on 8.5.2009 with further clarification that the petitioners may satisfy the competent authority, who may be District Education Officer or the Block Elementary Education Officer about the genuineness of the documents as well as continuity of their working in the year 2008-2009. The directions given in the above writ petitions are incorporated in these writ petitions which are as under: -

(3.) It is further stated at bar by the learned counsel for the parties that some of the petitioners approached the Division Bench of this Court against the judgment of learned Single Judge which was rendered prior to the aforesaid quoted order, and one such special appeal being Special Appeal No. 580/2009 in SBCWP No. 4187/2009 came to be dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court recently vide judgment dated 15.02.2010, wherein it has been held as under: These appeals involving identical issues have been considered together and are taken up for disposal by this common order.