RUKMI DEVI Vs. HARI SHANKER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY this revision petition, the petitioner has sought to challenge the order dated 9. 5. 2000, whereby,the case has been ordered to be put up on 4. 7. 2000. Suffice it to say that, this order does not amount to any "case decided" requiring interference by this Court u/s. 115 CPC. As such, the revision petition has no merit and rather is not maintainable, and is hereby dismissed summarily.

(2.) HOWEVER, vide order dated 24. 5. 2000, the learned trial court was directed to explain the circumstances as to why the matter is being prolonged so long when the provisional determination is to be made summarily after filing of the written statement, when the suit has been filed in the year 1992. The explanation has been received vide letter dated 30. 6. 2000, wherefrom, it is clear that the suit was filed on 13. 10. 92 and the written statement was filed on 24. 8. 93. Thereafter, according to the report, applications after applications have been filed whether for amendment of the written statement or under Order 11, Rule 16 CPC or under Order 19 Rule 2 CPC or under Order 6 Rule 5 or under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC or the like. Be that as it may.