OM PRAKASH Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has filed this review petition alleging that certain aspects of the case alleged by him have not been considered by the Division Bench and it has finally decided the case.

(2.) EARLIER the petitioner has raised a preliminary objection regarding the competence of this bench hearing this review petition singly. That objection was overruled by the order dated 31.3.2000. Hence, this review petition was heard by me sitting singly because the other Hon'ble Judge continuing the bench Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Shivaraj v. Patil, as he then was, was not available for hearing.

(3.) THE petitioner has also submitted that the conduct of Mr. Mathur tantamounts to fraud and any judgment obtained by fraud cannot be sustained.