HARI SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision against the order of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bali dated 8.4.1992 by which he framed charge under Section 306 IPC against the petitioners.

(2.) I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and have gone through the record.

(3.) COUNSEL for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners did not add or abet the offence and, therefore, the charge framed against the petitioners is totally groundless. He cited 1985 (10) RCC page 257, Gautam Raj Mehta Vs The State of Rajasthan in which following words were used - rw esjk fj'rsnkj gS A rwus gekjh cnukeh djok nh A blls rks vPNk gksrk rw ej tkrk A