LADHU SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition is an example showing as with what sincerity and responsibility some of the Lawyers work and what price their litigants have to pay.

(2.) THE petitioner had earlier filed writ petition No. 109/1985, challenging the judgment and order passed by the Board of Revenue dated 31. 12. 80, rejecting the appeal and dated 5. 6. 84, dismissing the review application filed by the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner. It appears that this Court issued notice on the application for bringing the legal representatives of one of the parties on record and learned counsel for the petitioner did not file the P. F. and Registration Charges, though several opportunities were given to him. This Court passed a pre-emptory order on 10. 9. 93, but that was also not complied with. Thus, the matter stood dismissed in default vide order dated 22. 2. 94. THE application for restoration was filed and only on humanitarian consideration, an unwarranted sympathetic view was taken and vide order dated 29. 7. 98, instead of restoring the petition, the petitioner was given liberty to file fresh writ petition challenging the impugned orders dated 31. 12. 80 and 5. 6. 84.