DHOOL CHAND Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PRESENT appeal has been filed by the plaintiff, whose suit for damages has been dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, Rajsamand, vide judgment and decree dated 6. 10. 1983.

(2.) THE case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff is an Agriculturist who undertakes agricultural operation by scientific system. According to the plaintiff, in the year, 1976, internal National Emergency was promulgated and Family Planning Campaign was being implemented at the Government level and, in this process, the defendants No. 2 & 3, on 7. 10. 1976, are said to have persuaded, rather forced the plaintiff to motivate persons for sterilisation operations. THE plaintiff, on account of his wife ailing, declined. Consequently, being annoyed, the defendant No. 2 asked the plaintiff to get himself operated and on that count, nursed ill-will against the plaintiff.

(3.) I have gone through the record available with the Court as the records consisting of the statements and documents are not available and appear to have been weeded out, whatever evidence was available with the learned counsel for the parties, has been perused, with their consent.