HARISH SANCHETI Vs. U.I.T., JODHPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE matter comes up for consideration of stay petition. However, with consent of the parties, the main revision itself has been finally heard.

(2.) THE plaintiff has filed the present suit for perpetual injunction with respect to the piece of the land described in para (sic) of the plaint alleged to have been purchased by him vide different sale deeds as detailed therein and the plaintiff also annexed a Site plan of the entire parcel of the land alongwith suit marking the land as ABCD. The allegation of the plaintiff inter alia that the original defendant the Urban Improvement Trust is out and out to forcibly dispossess, while he is in lawful possession of the land, under the registered sale deeds and having paid a huge amount of Rs. 4,84,871/- by way of development charge.

(3.) THE learned trial Court by the impugned order has refused the application for amendment on the ground that if the amendment is allowed, it would change the nature of the suit.