JABBAR KHAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SHARIF Mohd. Jabar Khan, Musted Khan are sons of one Gulam Mohd. and their wives, Ilaichi Bano, Batul Bano and Shahida Bano-petitioners have filed these six separate petitions before this Court and challenged the common order dated 1. 1. 2000 passed by the Collector, Hanumangarh in appeal No. 116/99 to 121/99 filed by private respondent Subhash Chandra in all these petitions, whereby, the learned Collector accepted the appeals filed by Subhash Chandra and quashed and set aside the order passed by the S. D. M. Nohar and directed to delete the names of petitioners from voter list of ward No. 5 of chak 22 N. T. R. Tehsil-Nohar District Hanumangarh.

(2.) ALL these petitions are disposed of by this common order as the common point is involved in all these matters and the impugned order dated 1. 1. 2000 is also same. Learned counsel Shri Vijay Bishnoi for the petitioners submitted that learned Collector was wrong in allowing the appeals filed by the private respondent-Subhash Chandra and ordering deletion of the names of the petitioners from the voter list of ward No. 5 chak 22 N. T. R. Tehsil-Nohar. He submitted that there is a voluminous evidence in favour of all the petitioners to show that they were bonafide residents of ward No. 5, chak 22 N. T. R. and when the S. D. M. , Nohar after appreciating the documentary evidence led before him passed the order of including the names of all the petitioners in the voter list of ward No. 5 of chak 22 N. T. R. , Tehsil-Nohar, the learned Collector ought not to have interfered in appeal filed by private respondent-Subhash Chandra, who had no locus standi.

(3.) AFTER carefully going through the common impugned order dated. 1. 1. 2000 passed by the District Collector, Hanumangarh, I find that impugned order is just, legal and proper order which does not require any interference by this Court in writ jurisdiction.