DHIR SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Being aggrieved by the order of conviction dt. 20-11-1984 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Balotra camp at Barmer in criminal case No. 41/1983, convicting the accused appellants for the offence under Section 374, Cr. P.C., this appeal is preferred on the ground mentioned in the memo of appeal and also verbally canvassed before me.

(2.) With the assistance of the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Public Prosecutor, I have scrutinised the record and reappreciated the evidence on record.

(3.) After going through the evidence and reappreciating the same, it was argued by the learned counsel for the appellants that following serious discrepancies are revealed by the record and therefore, the order of conviction is not sustainable :-