NAR NARAYAN BOHRA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) HAVING perused the order under appeal and documents annexed with this petition, we are in agreement with the conclusion reached by the learned Single Judge that after securing appointment to the post of Stenographer by litigating before this Court for seeking appointment and after having successful in that endeavour the petitioner has consistently avoided to join his duties at Jaisalmer where he was consistently asked to join through different orders and therefore, ultimately the order passed by the competent authority that since the petitioner -appellant has failed to join within time permitted to him at the place of posting he must be deemed to be not willing to join the duty and his appointment be cancelled.

(3.) WE are in these circumstances have no hesitation to reach the same conclusion reached by the learned Single Judge, that petitioner has not wilfully availed the appointment offered to him. The Court has never directed to offer an appointment to the petitioner at Jodhpur only.