LAWS(J&K)-1998-2-73

SUDERSHAN SETHI Vs. STATE OF J & K

Decided On February 20, 1998
Sudershan Sethi Appellant
V/S
STATE OF J AND K Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Absence from service has been treated as a mis-conduct. The services of the petitioner have been brought to an end. Relationship of master and servant stand snapped under the Service Regulations namely Article 113 of Jammu and Kashmir Service Regulations. These regulations make a provision to the effect that if a particular employee remains absent for a specified period, then his service would automatically come to an end. It is this action of respondent-authorities which is subject matter of adjudication in this petition. The facts in brief are as under :

(2.) Respondents have filed the return. It is stated that the petitioner remained absent for quite some time. It is the case of the respondents that the petitioner did not join her duties after summer vacation of 1980. As the petitioner remained absent from duties for more than five years, therefore, she would be deemed to have forfeited her job in view of deeming provisions contained in Article 113 of the Service Regulation referred to above. It is further stated that no leave letter was ever sent by the petitioner and the story as put up in the petition regarding sending of the leave letters is in- correct. In these circumstances, it is stated that the stand of the respondent-authorities, which was communicated to the petitioner vide letter No. Estt/3389 dated 22nd of June 1987 that she is not entitled to join the duties is absolutely correct.

(3.) The question as to whether absence from service or abandonment of service which term has been used in the Industrial Law is per se mis-conduct and the relationship of master and servant can be brought to an end with or without holding enquiry, is required to be gone into in this petition. The questions which would naturally arise for determination are being serialised below :