LAWS(J&K)-1998-9-33

GH RASOOL DAR Vs. STATE

Decided On September 08, 1998
Gh Rasool Dar Appellant
V/S
STATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) 21 petitioners approached this court, Their grievance was that the orders terminating their service tenure, which orders were passed in exercise of powers conferred under Section 126(2)(c) of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir are not in accordance with law. It is these orders which are being assailed in the joint petition preferred by the aforementioned 21 writ petitioners.

(2.) AS orders are similarly worded and have been passed in similar circumstances, it would be apt to notice the order which reads as under: -

(3.) A perusal of the order makes it apparent that this has been passed on the ground that the security of the State requires dispensation with the holding of regular enquiry,