LAWS(J&K)-2018-3-150

YASMEENA AKHTER Vs. TARIQ AHMAD GOSANI

Decided On March 12, 2018
YASMEENA AKHTER Appellant
V/S
Tariq Ahmad Gosani Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The applicant herein this application filed under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeks the transfer/withdrawal of the Civil suit titled as "Tariq Ahmad Gosani Vs. Yasmeena Akhter" from the court of City Munsiff/1st Class Judicial Magistrate Srinagar to the Court of Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Anantnag, on the grounds inter-alia, that on 28.05.2015 she filed an application under section 488 CrPc, 1973 before the Court of Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Anantnag, and in addition to it she filed another application under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act, which is subjudice in the Court of the Ld. Munsiff Anantnag. She was constrained to take resort to this course after she was thrown out by the respondent (i.e. her husband) from her matrimonial home. She was compelled to take refuge in her parental home because of the rude and abominable behavior of the respondent. The applicant has proceeded to state that after the institution of the above said proceedings at Anantnag, the nonapplicant filed a suit for Declaration and Injunction before the Court of Ld. Principal District Judge Srinagar on 06th of June 2015 which in turn came to be transferred to the Court of the Ld. City Munsiff 1st Class Judicial Magistrate Srinagar.

(2.) The applicant has further contended that she was beaten and rebuked by the nonapplicant and his relatives within the court premises at Srinagar and they do not allow her to pursue the cause at Srinagar. At one point of time ex-parte proceedings were initiated against her in the said suit which were latter on set aside by the Court. The applicant has further pleaded that her father is a poor man. He is not in position to bare her travel expenses and to crown it all two cases are already pending disposal before the Courts situated at Anantnag between the same parties covering almost the same subject matter and in order to avoid any conflict in the judgements, her application may be allowed. The applicant has also stated that she is blessed with two daughters one of whom is a suckling babe and her absence will tell upon their health.

(3.) Heard and considered.